rdf:type | <https://jpsearch.go.jp/term/type/資料一般> |
rdfs:label | "Environmental Dilemmas and Policy Design" |
schema:name | "Environmental Dilemmas and Policy Design" @ja |
ns0:accessInfo | #accessinfo |
ns0:agential 2 | _:vb11315020 (an orphan bnode) |
ns0:agential | _:vb11315021 (an orphan bnode) |
ns0:sourceInfo | #sourceinfo |
ns0:spatial | _:vb11315022 (an orphan bnode) |
ns0:temporal | _:vb11315023 (an orphan bnode) |
schema:contributor | <https://jpsearch.go.jp/entity/ncname/Huib_Pellikaan_Robert_J._van_der_Veen> (➜ "Huib Pellikaan Robert J. van der Veen") |
schema:dateCreated | "2002" |
schema:description 2 | "内容記述: Part I. Background: 1. Environmental pollution as a problem of collective action: 1.1. Can something be done?; 1.2. Environmental dilemmas and the logic of collective action; 1.3. Surveying environmental dilemmas from the actor's perspective: rational choice; 1.4. How motives speak to preferences; 1.5. Non-equivalent dilemmas and reported behaviour; 1.6. Policies of self-regulation in the Netherlands; 1.7. Moral commitment in environmental dilemmas: conditional or unconditional?; 1.8. Determinants of cooperation in environmental dilemmas and policy design; 2. A Dutch approach: self-regulation as a policy concept: 2.1. Introduction; 2.2. Dutch environmental policy and the idea of self-regulation; 2.3. The social instruments; 2.4. An environmental ethos and the social dilemma; 2.5. Self-regulation: compliance-oriented or virtue-based?; 3. The actor's perspective on collective action: 3.1. The subjectivity of the actor in rational choice theory; 3.2. Problems of collective action; 3.3. Social dilemmas; 3.4. The actor's perspective; Part II. The survey: 4. Preference ordering and measurement: 4.1. Three potential social dilemmas; 4.2. Measuring preference orderings; 4.3. Three different environmental problems; 4.4. Avoiding response effects; 5. Rational choice: 5.1. Conditions of rational choice; 5.2. The dominance rule of rational choice; 5.3. Choice of strategy; 5.4 The robustness of the dominance rule; 5.5. Conclusion; 6. Consistency of motives and preferences: 6.1. A model of reasoned choice; 6.2. The motives of Valuation and Willingness; 6.3. The test of consistent presences; 6.4. Consistent preferences in the three cases; 6.5. Does motive-preference consistency matter?; 6.6. Conclusion; 7. The non-equivalence of the cases: 7.1. Hard and easy cases of the dilemma; 7.2. The model of the hardest case; 7.3. The scalability of the cases; 7.4. The non-equivalence of social dilemmas; 8. Reported behaviour: 8.1. Determinants of behaviour; 8.2. The sociocultural model; 8.3. An alternative model; 8.4. From motives to behavior; Part III. Conclusion:s: theory and policy: 9. Do people accept self-regulation policy?: 9.1. Introduction to part III; 9.2. Acceptance and agreement; 9.3. The acceptance of legal regulation and self-regulation; 9.4. Conclusion; 10. Do people agree with the environmental ethos?: 10.1. Introduction; 10.2. The two stages of the environmental ethos; 10.3. Knaves, pawns or knights?; 10.4. The ethical interpretation of motives and preferences; 10.5. The agreement response; 10.6. Acceptance and agreement: overview; 11. Moral commitment and rational cooperation: 11.1. Ranking preference orderings; 11.2. The meta-ranking approach; 11.3. Enlightened self-interest and moral commitment; 11.4. Consistent preferences in the meta-ranking; 11.5. An environmental meta-ranking; 12. Reciprocity and cooperation in environmental dilemmas: 12.1. The puzzle of unconditional cooperation; 12.2. The reciprocity thesis; 12.3. Cost of cooperation and conditionalities in environmental dilemmas; 13. Assessing self-regulation policies: 13.1. The context of environmental dilemmas; 13.2. Consistent ethical cooperation; 13.3. Background features of hard and easy cases; 13.4. Mapping problems and the salience of the environmental ethos; 13.5. Individual cost and collective gain; 13.6. Comparing motives in the polar cases; 13.7. The dimension of private significance; 13.8. Self-regulation policy: symbolic or real?; 13.9. A non-moralistic approach to environmental responsibility; 13.10. Self-regulation in proportion to facilitation....(more)" |
schema:description | "公開者: Cambridge, UK" |
schema:publisher | <https://jpsearch.go.jp/entity/chname/ケンブリッジ大学出版局> |
schema:spatial | <https://jpsearch.go.jp/entity/place/イギリス> |
schema:temporal | <https://jpsearch.go.jp/entity/time/2002> (➜ "2002年") |