Judging social rights - Japan Search model RDF

(There is only one resource "Judging social rights (図書)" with description graph. Other 5 resources are in nested tables, or just refer to the source resource and have no own description)

Judging social rights

description of https://ld.webcatplus.jp/data/12443441
rdf:type<https://jpsearch.go.jp/term/type/図書>
rdfs:label"Judging social rights"
schema:name"Judging social rights" @en
ns0:accessInfo#accessinfo
ns0:agential 3_:vb66452062 (an orphan bnode)
ns0:agential_:vb66452060 (an orphan bnode)
ns0:agential_:vb66452061 (an orphan bnode)
ns0:partOf_:vb66452063 (an orphan bnode)
ns0:sourceInfo#sourceinfo
ns0:spatial_:vb66452064 (an orphan bnode)
ns0:temporal_:vb66452065 (an orphan bnode)
schema:about 5<https://jpsearch.go.jp/term/keyword/Judicial_power--_Social_aspects>
schema:about<https://jpsearch.go.jp/term/keyword/Political_questions_and_judicial_power>
schema:about<https://jpsearch.go.jp/term/keyword/Social_justice>
schema:about<https://jpsearch.go.jp/term/keyword/Social_rights>
schema:about<https://jpsearch.go.jp/term/keyword/Constitutional_law>
schema:creator 2<https://ld.webcatplus.jp/entity/C2449836>
schema:creator<https://jpsearch.go.jp/entity/ncname/King_Jeff_A.> ( "King Jeff A.")
schema:datePublished"2012"
schema:description 6"資料種別: Hardback"
schema:description"資料種別: Paperback / softback"
schema:description"注記: Includes bibliographical references (p. 328-355) and index"
schema:description"備考: Countries that now contemplate constitutional reform often grapple with the question of whether to constitutionalise social rights. This book presents an argument for why, under the right conditions, doing so can be a good way to advance social justice. In making such a case, the author considers the nature of the social minimum, the role of courts among other institutions, the empirical record of judicial impact, and the role of constitutional text. He argues, however, that when enforcing such rights, judges ought to adopt a theory of judicial restraint structured around four principles: democratic legitimacy, polycentricity, expertise and flexibility. These four principles, when taken collectively, commend an incrementalist approach to adjudication. The book combines theoretical, doctrinal, empirical and comparative analysis, and is written to be accessible to lawyers, social scientists, political theorists and human rights advocates. (Nielsen Book)...(more)"
schema:description"責任表示: Jeff King"
schema:description"分類: LCC:KF4749; DC23:342.08/5; BIC:LJD; BIC:JPA; BIC:JPVH"
schema:encodingFormat 2<https://ld.webcatplus.jp/ext/code/onix#BC>
schema:encodingFormat<https://ld.webcatplus.jp/ext/code/onix#BB>
schema:genre<https://id.loc.gov/authorities/classification/KF4749>
schema:inLanguage<http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/iso639-2/eng> ( "英語")
schema:isPartOf<https://ld.webcatplus.jp/data/11924072>
schema:isbn 2"9781107008021"
schema:isbn"9781107400320"
schema:numberOfPages"xxvii, 370 p."
schema:publisher<https://ld.webcatplus.jp/entity/P163478>
schema:size"23 cm"
schema:spatial<https://jpsearch.go.jp/entity/place/イギリス>
schema:temporal<https://jpsearch.go.jp/entity/time/2012> ( "2012年")
schema:tocEntry"1. Aims and methods; Part I. The Case for Constitutional Social Rights: 2. The case for social rights; 3. The value of courts in light of the alternatives; 4. A basic interpretive approach; Part II. A Theory of Judicial Restraint: 5. Institutional approaches to judicial restraint; 6. Democratic legitimacy; 7. Polycentricity; 8. Expertise; 9. Flexibility; Part III. Incrementalism: 10. Incrementalism as a general theme....(more)"
43 triples ()
43 triples